| Candidate |
______________________________________________ |
| |
|
|
Affiliation |
______________________________________________ |
| |
|
| Title |
______________________________________________ |
| |
______________________________________________ |
| |
|
|
| Date & time |
______________________ |
Circle one: Oral
Poster |
Evaluation of Presentation. Presentations are to be
judged in five equally weighted categories. Please avoid using pluses, minuses,
or otherwise indicating a non-integer score. Each category should be evaluated
as:
| Outstanding |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Significance of ideas |
___________ |
| Creativity |
___________ |
| Quality of methodology |
___________ |
| Validity of conclusions drawn from results |
___________ |
| Clarity of presentation |
___________ |
Additional comments that more fully explain your
evaluation. These are very important to the selection committee.
| _____________________________________________ |
| _____________________________________________ |
| _____________________________________________ |
| _____________________________________________ |
| _____________________________________________ |
| How well did the presenter answer questions? |
| ________________________________________________________ |
| ________________________________________________________ |
Judge's estimate of own ability to evaluate this
presentation:
High _____ Medium _____ Low _______
Name _______________________ Email ________________________
Affiliation __________________________________________________
Main |
Students | Judges | Oral
Advice | Poster Advice
Evaluation Form |
US-IALE 2008 Meeting Info
|
